SolidJS vs. RedwoodJS

What is SolidJS?

SolidJS is a modern reactive JavaScript library for building fast, declarative user interfaces. Inspired by React, it focuses on fine-grained reactivity and compiles templates to efficient JavaScript code, making applications both lightweight and performant.

Unlike React, SolidJS doesn’t use a virtual DOM. Instead, it updates only the parts of the DOM that change, resulting in better performance and smaller bundle sizes.

Key Features of SolidJS

×

• Fine-grained reactivity: Updates DOM precisely where needed, without re-rendering entire components.
• JSX support: Uses JSX syntax, making it easy for React developers to learn.
• No Virtual DOM: Direct DOM updates for better performance and lower memory usage.
• Small bundle size: Lightweight, leading to faster load times.
• Component-based: Similar to React, it uses reusable, composable components.
• TypeScript support: First-class TypeScript support for type safety.
• Simple learning curve: Easy for developers familiar with React or modern frontend frameworks.

Advantages of SolidJS

• Performance: Outperforms most frameworks thanks to fine-grained reactivity and DOM compilation.
• React-Like Syntax: Easy for React developers to adopt.
• Small & Lightweight: Tiny runtime with minimal overhead.
• Flexible State Management: Built-in signals and stores reduce the need for external libraries.
• SSR Ready: Great for SEO-driven apps like blogs or e-commerce.

Disadvantages of SolidJS

• Smaller Ecosystem: Fewer libraries, tools, and community packages compared to React or Vue.
• Learning Curve: React developers may need to unlearn Virtual DOM patterns.
• Evolving Framework: Still relatively young, so some integrations (like CMS or UI libraries) may require custom solutions.
• Smaller Community: Less support and fewer tutorials compared to React.

What is RedwoodJS ?

RedwoodJS is a full-stack JavaScript framework. It gives you frontend, backend, GraphQL API, and database in one neat package. Basically, instead of wiring React + Node + GraphQL + Prisma manually, Redwood gives you everything set up out-of-the-box.

Good for startups or devs who wanna ship MVPs fast without thinking too much about architecture.

×

• Full-stack framework: frontend + backend + database all in one repo
• GraphQL API built-in: automatic API scaffolding
• Prisma integration: type-safe DB access, migrations handled
• CLI for scaffolding: create pages, components, services quickly
• Built-in auth: supports Auth0, Supabase, Netlify Identity
• Opinionated folder structure: guides you on how to organize code
• TypeScript ready: strong TS support out of the box

Advantages of RedwoodJS

• Comes with full-stack setup out of the box: frontend, backend, database, deploy all in one.
• Opinionated structure: no guessing “where should I put this file?” – conventions guide you.
• Tight GraphQL integration: faster API work, with auto-generated SDLs and services.
• Database via Prisma: type-safe queries, easy migrations, works with many databases.
• Built-in auth system: supports Auth0, Supabase, dbAuth, Netlify Identity, and more.
• CLI scaffolding: quickly spin up pages, components, services, CRUD.
• Great for startups: ship MVPs fast without stitching tools together.

Disadvantages of RedwoodJS

• Still new: ecosystem is smaller than frameworks like Next.js or Remix.
• Less flexible: opinionated folder structure may feel restrictive.
• GraphQL learning curve: extra work if you haven’t used it before.
• Prisma adds another layer: you need to learn it for database handling.
• Community packages are limited: fewer plugins/extensions compared to bigger frameworks.
• Not much enterprise adoption yet: less battle-tested at huge scale.
• Documentation improving: but can sometimes feel limited or incomplete.