Foundation vs. Tachyons

ImageBy SW Habitation
Foundation

Foundation

vs
Tachyons

Tachyons

You know how building a website can feel like a lot, especially when you’re trying to style every little thing yourself? Buttons, forms, layouts… it adds up fast. That’s where UI frameworks really save the day. They give you a bunch of premade design elements that you can just drop in and go. It’s like having a design starter pack that helps your site look clean and professional, without spending forever tweaking the details.

What is Foundation?

Foundation by Zurb is a responsive front-end framework designed for creating responsive and accessible websites quickly. It is known for its mobile-first approach and powerful grid system, Foundation provides a set of prebuilt components and tools that help developers create professional websites, prototypes, and production-ready apps.

Foundation has been widely used by enterprises and is praised for its accessibility features that makes a solid choice for large-scale projects.

Key Features of Foundation

Key Features of Foundation
  • Responsive Grid: Flexible 12-column grid with responsive breakpoints.
  • UI Components: Includes buttons, forms, sliders, menus, modals, tooltips, and more.
  • Accessibility: ARIA support and semantic markup built in.
  • Sass Integration: Easy to customize with Sass variables and mixins.
  • Motion UI: Built-in animation library for smooth transitions.
  • Email Framework: Foundation for Emails to create responsive email templates.

Advantages of Foundation

  • Theming : Sass variables, mixins, and functions allow deep but easy customization.
  • Consistency : Provides a consistent design system for teams working on large projects.
  • Accessibility : Built-in ARIA support and WCAG compliance for inclusive websites.
  • Grid System : Responsive, flexible grid with custom breakpoints for any screen size.
  • Mobile-First : Designed with a mobile-first approach, ensuring layouts work on small screens first.
  • Components : Includes a wide range of prebuilt UI components like buttons, forms, menus, and modals.
  • Professional Use : Trusted by enterprises and large projects where stability and accessibility matter.
  • Integration : Plays well with modern build tools (Gulp, Webpack, npm) for scalable workflows.
  • Responsive Emails : Comes with Foundation for Emails to create mobile-friendly email templates.

Disadvantages of Foundation

  • Design Opinionated : Prebuilt components feel dated compared to newer UI frameworks.
  • Support : Fewer active tutorials, blog posts, and YouTube guides compared to Bootstrap.
  • Learning Curve : More advanced setup and Sass knowledge needed, unlike Bulma or Bootstrap.
  • Weight : Bigger in size than minimal CSS frameworks, which can affect performance.
  • Popularity : Less adoption in recent years compared to Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Community : Smaller user base and fewer third-party themes or extensions.
  • Complexity : Might be overkill for small projects that don’t need advanced features.
  • Documentation : Feels less beginner-friendly and not updated as frequently.

What isTachyons?

Tachyons is a functional/atomic CSS framework that uses small, reusable utility classes. Instead of big UI components or deeply nested CSS, Tachyons encourages developers to style elements using many tiny, single-purpose classes.

Let's check by the example,

Copy Code
1 2 3 <button class="f6 link dim br3 ph3 pv2 mb2 dib white bg-dark-blue"> Click Me! </button>

Here, each class f6, br3, ph3 controls a specific CSS property like font size, border radius, padding, etc. This modular approach makes styling predictable and reusable.

Tachyons was one of the innovator of the utility-first CSS movement—it influenced modern frameworks like Tailwind.

Key Features of Tachyons

Tachyons
  • Atomic CSS Classes: Every class does one thing (e.g., pa3 = padding).
  • Responsive Utilities: Classes adapt to multiple screen sizes.
  • Small Bundle Size: Around 14KB minified & gzipped.
  • Performance-Oriented: Encourages minimal CSS output.
  • Accessible Defaults: Typography and spacing built for readability.
  • Framework-Free: Works with plain HTML, React, Vue, or any frontend.
  • Rapid Prototyping: Compose UIs quickly with utility classes.

Advantages of Tachyons

  • Stable: Mature and widely battle-tested since 2015.
  • Highly Composable: Mix classes freely to achieve complex designs.
  • Consistent: Predictable, reusable naming system.
  • Fast & Lightweight: Tiny CSS footprint.
  • Great for Prototypes: Quickly test ideas without writing custom CSS.
  • Utility-First Approach: No deep CSS overrides needed.

Disadvantages of Tachyons

  • Smaller Community: Fewer themes, templates, and ecosystem resources.
  • Messy HTML: Can lead to class-heavy markup that’s harder to read.
  • No Components: You must build everything (buttons, navbars, modals) manually.
  • Learning Curve: Class names (pa3, f5) are shorthand and non-intuitive for beginners.
  • Not Actively Maintained: Less frequent updates compared to newer frameworks.

Comparison Between Foundation vs Tachyons

FeaturesFoundationTachyons
PhilosophyResponsive front-end framework with accessibility focusFunctional CSS with small, single-purpose classes
Ease of Use Moderate, a bit steeper than BootstrapVery easy, just apply atomic classes
CustomizationStrong — Sass mixins, variables, themingLimited customization; mainly extend via custom CSS
Design SystemIncludes responsive grid, UI components, Motion UIPredefined design scale (spacing, typography, colors)
Responsiveness Powerful flex/grid system with flexible breakpointsBuilt-in responsive classes (mobile-first)
File SizeMedium to largeVery small (~14KB minified)
Learning CurveMediumVery low (intuitive class names)
PricingFree and open-sourceFree & open-source
Best ForEnterprise sites, responsive web apps, accessible UIsLightweight, fast prototyping & production
Styling Method Sass, CSSAtomic utility classes directly in HTML
Accessibility Strong accessibility supportNo built-in a11y, but encourages semantic HTML
Dark ModeManual implementationNo native dark mode, requires custom setup
Framework Any (HTML/CSS/JS)Any (pure CSS, framework-agnostic)
Bundle Size Medium to largeTiny (14KB gzipped)

Use Cases of Foundation

  • Websites needing advanced UI components with JS integration.
  • Projects needing responsive emails + websites.
  • Large-scale projects with complex layouts.
  • Enterprise websites requiring accessibility.

Use Cases of Tachyons

  • Rapid prototyping and MVPs.
  • Building custom UIs without depending on pre-styled components.
  • Designers who want total control over design instead of prebuilt themes.
  • Developers who like atomic/functional CSS.
  • Lightweight projects where performance is critical.

Conclusion

UI frameworks make building a polished website way easier. Whether you're working on something simple or a big project, they help you get things looking just right without having to stress over every little design decision. With ready-to-use components, responsive layouts, and modern styles, you can build faster and smarter.

So, pick one that works for you, and start creating a site that looks amazing from the get-go.

You can also compare
vs

Frequently asked questions

What is Foundation CSS?

How is it different from Bootstrap?

Is Foundation mobile-first?

Can I customize Foundation easily?

Does Foundation support accessibility?

How do I start using Tachyons?

What makes Tachyons different?

How big is Tachyons?

Can I customize Tachyons?

Is Tachyons enough for UI development?