Fomantic-UI vs. Foundation

ImageBy SW Habitation
Fomantic-UI

Fomantic-UI

vs
Foundation

Foundation

You know how building a website can feel like a lot, especially when you’re trying to style every little thing yourself? Buttons, forms, layouts… it adds up fast. That’s where UI frameworks really save the day. They give you a bunch of premade design elements that you can just drop in and go. It’s like having a design starter pack that helps your site look clean and professional, without spending forever tweaking the details.

What is Fomantic-UI?

Fomantic-UI is a modern version of the popular Semantic UI, made and improved by the community. It is a tool for building websites that are responsive, easy to style, and user-friendly, fast.

It focuses on semantic class names that read like natural language, making code more intuitive and easier to understand. Since it’s a fork, it has continued where Semantic UI left off, with new features, updates, and active maintenance by the community.

Key Features of Fomantic-UI

Key Features of Fomantic-UI
  • Human-Friendly Classes: Semantic class names like ui button, ui card, ui grid.
  • Rich Components: Buttons, forms, modals, dropdowns, cards, tabs, and more.
  • JavaScript Behaviors: Built-in behaviors for modals, accordions, dropdowns, sliders, etc.
  • Responsive Grid: Powerful 16-column responsive grid system.
  • Theming System: Fully themable with LESS variables and customization options.
  • Extensible: Modular build — include only what you need.
  • Community-Powered: Active development and updates compared to the abandoned Semantic UI.

Advantages of Fomantic-UI

  • Full-Featured: Includes both CSS components and JavaScript behaviors.
  • Rich UI Library: Over 50 components for quick UI building.
  • Readable Code: Natural-language style class names make HTML easier to read.
  • All-in-One Framework: No need to rely on external JS for basic UI behaviors.
  • Strong Theming Support: Easily customizable with LESS variables.
  • Community Driven: Regularly updated and maintained by the community.

Disadvantages of Fomantic-UI

  • Requires jQuery: JavaScript behaviors still depend on jQuery.
  • Learning Curve: Semantic-style class names may feel unusual for new developers.
  • LESS Dependency: Built on LESS, which is less popular today compared to Sass or CSS-in-JS.
  • Not as Popular: Smaller ecosystem compared to Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Heavy File Size: Larger compared to lightweight frameworks like Bulma or Milligram.

What is Foundation?

Foundation by Zurb is a responsive front-end framework designed for creating responsive and accessible websites quickly. It is known for its mobile-first approach and powerful grid system, Foundation provides a set of prebuilt components and tools that help developers create professional websites, prototypes, and production-ready apps.

Foundation has been widely used by enterprises and is praised for its accessibility features that makes a solid choice for large-scale projects.

Key Features of Foundation

Key Features of Foundation
  • Responsive Grid: Flexible 12-column grid with responsive breakpoints.
  • UI Components: Includes buttons, forms, sliders, menus, modals, tooltips, and more.
  • Accessibility: ARIA support and semantic markup built in.
  • Sass Integration: Easy to customize with Sass variables and mixins.
  • Motion UI: Built-in animation library for smooth transitions.
  • Email Framework: Foundation for Emails to create responsive email templates.

Advantages of Foundation

  • Theming : Sass variables, mixins, and functions allow deep but easy customization.
  • Consistency : Provides a consistent design system for teams working on large projects.
  • Accessibility : Built-in ARIA support and WCAG compliance for inclusive websites.
  • Grid System : Responsive, flexible grid with custom breakpoints for any screen size.
  • Mobile-First : Designed with a mobile-first approach, ensuring layouts work on small screens first.
  • Components : Includes a wide range of prebuilt UI components like buttons, forms, menus, and modals.
  • Professional Use : Trusted by enterprises and large projects where stability and accessibility matter.
  • Integration : Plays well with modern build tools (Gulp, Webpack, npm) for scalable workflows.
  • Responsive Emails : Comes with Foundation for Emails to create mobile-friendly email templates.

Disadvantages of Foundation

  • Design Opinionated : Prebuilt components feel dated compared to newer UI frameworks.
  • Support : Fewer active tutorials, blog posts, and YouTube guides compared to Bootstrap.
  • Learning Curve : More advanced setup and Sass knowledge needed, unlike Bulma or Bootstrap.
  • Weight : Bigger in size than minimal CSS frameworks, which can affect performance.
  • Popularity : Less adoption in recent years compared to Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS.
  • Community : Smaller user base and fewer third-party themes or extensions.
  • Complexity : Might be overkill for small projects that don’t need advanced features.
  • Documentation : Feels less beginner-friendly and not updated as frequently.

Comparison Between Fomantic-UI vs Foundation

FeaturesFomantic-UIFoundation
PhilosophyFeature-rich, themeable UI framework with pre-styled componentsResponsive front-end framework with accessibility focus
Ease of UseEasy, semantic class names but heavier setup than Bulma Moderate, a bit steeper than Bootstrap
CustomizationHigh - theming, variables, overridesStrong — Sass mixins, variables, theming
Design SystemStrong consistency with a wide range of UI patternsIncludes responsive grid, UI components, Motion UI
ResponsivenessBuilt-in responsive grid system Powerful flex/grid system with flexible breakpoints
File SizeLarge compared to lightweight frameworksMedium to large
Learning CurveModerate (more components & options to learn)Medium
PricingFree and open-sourceFree and open-source
Best ForComplex apps, dashboards, enterprise UIsEnterprise sites, responsive web apps, accessible UIs
Styling MethodSass, CSS classes, theming Sass, CSS
AccessibilityDecent but not fully WCAG-first Strong accessibility support
Dark ModeManual implementationManual implementation
FrameworkWorks with HTML/CSS/JS (integrations available) Any (HTML/CSS/JS)
Bundle SizeLarge if full library is included Medium to large

Use Cases of Fomantic-UI

  • Teams migrating from Semantic UI: Seamless replacement with updates and support.
  • Enterprise Web Apps: Strong theming and responsive layout capabilities.
  • Prototypes: Quickly build UI with semantic classes.
  • Admin Dashboards: Ready-to-use components and JS behaviors.
  • Apps Requiring Complex UI: Dropdowns, modals, tabs, accordions built in.

Use Cases of Foundation

  • Websites needing advanced UI components with JS integration.
  • Projects needing responsive emails + websites.
  • Large-scale projects with complex layouts.
  • Enterprise websites requiring accessibility.

Conclusion

UI frameworks make building a polished website way easier. Whether you're working on something simple or a big project, they help you get things looking just right without having to stress over every little design decision. With ready-to-use components, responsive layouts, and modern styles, you can build faster and smarter.

So, pick one that works for you, and start creating a site that looks amazing from the get-go.

You can also compare
vs

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Semantic UI and Fomantic-UI?

Does Fomantic-UI need JavaScript?

Is Fomantic-UI beginner-friendly?

Can I use Fomantic-UI with React or Vue?

Is Fomantic-UI still maintained?

What is Foundation CSS?

How is it different from Bootstrap?

Is Foundation mobile-first?

Can I customize Foundation easily?

Does Foundation support accessibility?