Bulma vs. Bootstrap

ImageBy SW Habitation
Bulma

Bulma

vs
Bootstrap

Bootstrap

You know how building a website can feel like a lot, especially when you’re trying to style every little thing yourself? Buttons, forms, layouts… it adds up fast. That’s where UI frameworks really save the day. They give you a bunch of premade design elements that you can just drop in and go. It’s like having a design starter pack that helps your site look clean and professional, without spending forever tweaking the details.

What is Bulma?

Bulma is a modern, open-source CSS framework based entirely on Flexbox. Unlike Bootstrap or Foundation, Bulma is a pure CSS framework, it doesn’t come with JavaScript components, which makes it lightweight, simple, and easy to use.

Bulma is especially loved by developers who want a minimalist yet responsive framework for quickly building prototypes, small projects, and clean modern websites.

Key Features of Bulma

Key Features of Bulma
  • Lightweight: Small file size and fast performance.
  • Clean Syntax: Readable, intuitive class naming convention.
  • Customizable with Sass: Use Sass variables to easily adjust themes and styles.
  • Flexbox-based Grid: Fully powered by Flexbox for responsive and modern layouts.
  • Responsive Modifiers: Easy-to-use breakpoints for mobile, tablet, desktop, and widescreen.
  • Pure CSS: No JavaScript dependencies — works with any JS framework or vanilla JS.
  • Utility Classes: Includes helper classes for spacing, colors, display, typography, and more.

Advantages of Bulma

  • Responsive by Default: Built-in responsive utilities.
  • Fast Prototyping: Perfect for quick MVPs and small apps.
  • Lightweight: No extra JavaScript, only CSS.
  • Modern Layouts: Built entirely on Flexbox.
  • Cross-Browser Consistency: Works well across modern browsers.
  • Beginner-Friendly: Super easy to learn and use.

Disadvantages of Bulma

  • Not Ideal for Enterprises: May not scale as well for very large applications.
  • No JavaScript Plugins: Requires manual integration for modals, dropdowns, or carousels.
  • Smaller Ecosystem: Fewer themes, templates, and community add-ons compared to Bootstrap.
  • Limited Components: Doesn’t have as many prebuilt components as Bootstrap or Foundation.

What is Bootstrap ?

Bootstrap is the most popular CSS Framework for developing responsive and mobile-first websites. Do you know it was originally developed by Twitter now X and is now maintained by a large community of developers. Bootstrap provides a collection of pre-designed HTML, CSS, and JavaScript components that can be used to build websites quickly and easily.

Key Features of Bootstrap

Bootstrap
  • Responsive Grid: 12-column Flexbox grid with multiple breakpoints.
  • Prebuilt Components: Includes modals, tooltips, carousels, navbars, etc.
  • JavaScript Plugins: Native JS components — no jQuery dependency now.
  • Sass Source: Source code in Sass for easy customization.
  • Utility Classes: Tons of helper classes for spacing, colors, displays.
  • Theming Support: Customizable via Sass variables.

Advantages of Bootstrap

  • Fast Setup: Quickly spin up pages with minimal styling needed.
  • Consistency Across Browsers: Ensures uniform UI elements.
  • Large Ecosystem: Thousands of themes, templates, starters available
  • Modular: Easily import only needed components via Sass.
  • Strong Community: Longstanding support and wide adoption.

Disadvantages of Bootstrap

  • Learning Curve: Advanced customization requires more expertise
  • Overuse of Classes: Cluttered HTML, harder to maintain.
  • Heavy File Size: Includes unnecessary CSS/JS, increasing load times.
  • Limited Customization: Hard to deeply customize without overriding defaults.
  • Uniform Design: Sites can look similar unless customized heavily.

Comparison Between Bulma vs Bootstrap

FeaturesBulmaBootstrap
PhilosophyModern, lightweight, utility-first CSS frameworkPre-styled components for fast UI development
Ease of UseVery easy, just add classesVery beginner-friendly
CustomizationSass variables, modular importsLimited; via Sass variables
Design SystemBasic — typography, grid, componentsBasic design consistency
ResponsivenessMobile-first flexbox gridBuilt-in responsive grid
File SizeSmall to mediumMedium to large without customization
Learning CurveLowLow
PricingFree and open-sourceFree and open-source
Best ForQuick landing pages, prototypes, small appsQuick UIs, admin dashboards, MVPs
Styling MethodSass, CSS classesSass, plain CSS
AccessibilityDecent, but not as strong as FoundationBasic, not WCAG-first
Dark ModeManual implementationManual implementation
FrameworkAny (HTML/CSS/JS)Any (HTML/CSS/JS)
Bundle SizeSmallLarge if all components used

Use Cases of Bulma

  • Prototyping: Developers can spin up layouts rapidly.
  • Projects with JS Frameworks: Works seamlessly with React, Vue, Angular, or vanilla JS since it’s pure CSS.
  • Portfolios & Blogs: Great for personal projects with minimal setup.
  • Startups & MVPs: Perfect for small projects that need quick, clean UI.

Use Cases of Bootstrap

  • Projects where consistency outweighs custom design
  • Legacy apps or CMS integration
  • Quick MVPs and prototypes
  • Dashboard templates, admin panels

Conclusion

UI frameworks make building a polished website way easier. Whether you're working on something simple or a big project, they help you get things looking just right without having to stress over every little design decision. With ready-to-use components, responsive layouts, and modern styles, you can build faster and smarter.

So, pick one that works for you, and start creating a site that looks amazing from the get-go.

You can also compare
vs

Frequently asked questions

Is Bulma better than Bootstrap?

Does Bulma use Flexbox?

Can I use Bulma with React or Vue?

Does Bulma support dark mode?

Is Bulma good for beginners?

Can I use Bootstrap without JavaScript libraries?

Is Bootstrap responsive?

Do I need to know HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to use Bootstrap?

How does Bootstrap help with mobile responsiveness?