Blitz.js vs. Remix

What is Blitz.js ?

Imagine you wanto to build an app but setting up frontend, backend, APIs, database and it feels like overextended right ? That’s where Blitz.js comes in.

Blitz is like this super handy fullstack framework that sits on top of Next.js yup, the one you probably already know. Think of it like Rails but for React. You get Next.js goodies like (SSR, file-based routing, etc.), but Blitz throws in extra magic — like a zero-API data layer, built-in auth system, and easy database integration with Prisma.

Basically it is less boilerplate, more actual building.

Key Features of Blitz.js

×

• Zero-API Data Layer – call server functions straight from the client, no need to write API endpoints manually.
• Built on Next.js – so you don’t lose all the SSR/SSG goodness.
• Auth included – login/logout stuff already sorted.
• Code Generation – scaffolding to spin up queries, pages, mutations super fast.
• TypeScript ready – works smooth with TS.
• Database via Prisma – easy database access, feels natural.
• Plugins – add common stuff like Tailwind, auth, etc. with one command.
  

Advantages of Blitz.js

• All-in-one: You don’t need to glue 10 tools together.
• Boosts productivity: Code scaffolding saves so much time.
• Zero-API layer: Less boilerplate, no boring API wiring.
• Still Next.js inside: You can keep SSR, static exports, etc.
• Databases: Works great with Prisma and SQL databases.
• Community is small but passionate: New recipes, ideas keep coming.

Disadvantages of Blitz.js

• Might be overkill: If all you need is a tiny static site, Blitz is too heavy.
• New learning curve: You need to understand queries/mutations instead of normal APIs.
• Smaller community: Not as huge as Next.js, so fewer tutorials and resources.
• Dependent on Next.js: Since it’s built on Next, any big shift in Next.js affects Blitz.
• Still maturing: Some features and ecosystem tools are not as polished as older frameworks.

What is Remix ?

Remix is a React-based full-stack framework that focuses on server-side rendering (SSR) and progressive enhancement. Unlike static site generators, Remix loads data on the server and sends only what’s needed to the browser, making apps feel lightning-fast. It’s built to optimize UX, performance, and accessibility while giving developers a structured and scalable way to build web applications.

Key Features of Remix

×

• Server-Side Data Loading: Fetch data on the server before sending it to the client, reducing unnecessary API calls.
• Seamless API Integration: Easily connect with any backend or database.
• Built-in Form Handling: No need for external libraries like React Query – Remix handles form submissions naturally.
• Edge-Ready: Works seamlessly on edge computing platforms like Vercel and Cloudflare Workers.
• Progressive Enhancement: Apps work even if JavaScript is disabled, ensuring a smooth user experience.
• Nested Routes: Create modular components that load only the data they need, improving performance.
• Great DX (Developer Experience): Simple routing, fast refresh, and minimal boilerplate.

Advantages of Remix.run

• Works with Any Backend: Remix doesn’t lock you into a specific database or API.
• Improved UX: Fine-tuned loading strategies create a smoother browsing experience.
• Scalable: Works for both small projects and enterprise-grade applications.
• Great SEO: Unlike SPAs, Remix ensures search engines can index content properly.
• Fast and Efficient: Server-side rendering optimizes performance and reduces unnecessary re-renders.

Disadvantages of Remix.run

• Hosting Considerations: Requires a backend environment (like Node.js), so it’s not ideal for purely static sites.
• Newer Ecosystem: Compared to Next.js, Remix has fewer third-party integrations.
• Learning Curve: If you’re used to client-side React apps, SSR might take some time to grasp.